Skip to main content

​
Test a proposed fix on different events

When ChatGPT suggests a field extraction or mapping change, a solution that fits only the original example is not sufficient. Test it on a few other messages from the same source.

​
How to prepare different examples

Suppose the first event was:
For additional test logs, use records with different values or optional fields:
These examples are fictional. Use legitimate fresh examples from the relevant product when validating a real parser and keep private information in the browser.

​
Which buttons do I click?

  1. In ChatGPT Assisted Parser, first use Check ChatGPT Result.
  2. If the proposal needs further testing, paste the new examples under Additional ChatGPT test logs.
  3. Check Confirm test examples are different only when those records were not used to develop the candidate fix.
  4. Run the available comparison and inspect the result.
  5. Check Approve tested ChatGPT fix only if all original and additional events behave correctly.
Some unchanged, already-supported recipes may not require a changed-rule comparison. Follow the result shown by Parser Studio.

​
What if the test fails?

Do not approve the candidate. Inspect the field that changed, provide ChatGPT with a clearer masked explanation, and submit a revised supported response through the same review process.
A successful additional-sample test increases confidence for the records you examined. It does not prove that every other message from that product will work.
Return to the ChatGPT workflow · Review field extraction.
Last modified on October 18, 2026